Skip to main content

Will Nations Fight Bitcoin With Competing PoW? Game Theory Explained

In a discussion on X, Jason Lowery debated the viability and future of Reusable Proof-of-Work (RPoW) networks—particularly whether nations might attempt to create competing proof-of-work systems. The conversation was sparked by an inquiry from Rabbit Hole Investor (@rabbitholeinvst) directed at Lowery, an astronautical engineer, Major in the US Space Force, and author of the “Softwar” thesis. Lowery’s thesis emphasizes Bitcoin’s strategic importance for US national security.

Can Nation-States Fight Bitcoin With Their Own PoW Network?

Rabbit Hole Investor asked Lowery, “Do you see a future where other reusable proof of work networks are created for other applications?” Lowery responded by referencing questions he previously received from the White House Office of Science & Technology Policy.

He stated that while he cannot predict the future with absolute certainty, he believes there will be a dominant RPoW network that gains universal acceptance in much the same way that TCP/IP became the global standard for data transport: “This was one of the questions I received from the White House Office of Science & Technology Policy. […] My intuition is that a single dominant Reusable Proof-of-Work (RPoW) network will emerge as the primary standard—much like how TCP/IP became the universal protocol for data transport […] In RPoW, network size directly translates to security. […] This consolidation of all RPOW applications into one RPOW network […] is a strategic necessity.”

He elaborated on how RPoW’s security scales with computational power and energy expenditure, creating a “reinforcing cycle” that naturally incentivizes participants to migrate to the largest and most secure network. Lowery pointed to what he calls “Mutually Assured Preservation,” where even adversarial nation-states (e.g., NATO and BRICS) would effectively become “frenemies” on the same RPoW network. According to his assessment: “The cost of attacking either side increases to such an extent that they become ‘frenemies,’ each strengthening the security of the other’s interests on the same network.”

Lowery’s stance leans strongly toward Bitcoin as the dominant RPoW protocol. While he does not label himself a “Bitcoin Maximalist,” he makes it clear that Bitcoin is the de facto global PoW standard due to market forces and network effects.

Thomas Young, Managing Partner at RUMJog Enterprises, further probed Lowery’s thesis by asking about individual Bitcoin ownership and the monetization potential for BTC in a world where nation-states treat the network as “The Standard”: “Will it be practical for individuals to own privately held BTC? … Specifically, would interested nation states ‘rent’ privately held BTC to misattribute or create diversification or will they simply want to own their own BTC?”

Lowery replied: “I’m a subscriber to the belief that if Bitcoin becomes a global unit of account, its purchasing power will naturally increase as humanity grows more productive. This makes the need to chase yield obsolete—unnecessary, even. Bitcoin itself is the yield.”

He then shared a cautionary perspective on the promises of yield in a future where governments might adopt executive orders to seize custodial BTC. According to Lowery: “If I were a nefarious president or nation, I’d lure people into giving up self-custody of their BTC by dangling the promise of yield… Then, with a simple executive order, I’d nationalize NYDIG, Coinbase, and MSTR’s Bitcoin… This is why I don’t own MSTR. MSTR’s Bitcoin is a future president’s honeypot… When the next EO6102 inevitably comes, it will be widely supported.”

Another user asked Lowery whether sovereign entities might create their own networks—for instance, sidechains or drivechains pegged into the main Bitcoin network—under their sovereign control. Lowery responded by contrasting PoW and Proof of Stake (PoS) in terms of centralization: “If the goal is sovereign control over a network, then PoS is a far better design than PoW… A nation (or any entity) could simply pre-mine the tokens, distribute them to itself, and implement a vote-based PoS system… This structure would ensure that control remains centralized… while still maintaining the (false) appearance of a decentralized system.”

He acknowledged that a nation could create an RPoW network with centralized administrative control, but he considers this approach more complex and less efficient compared to a straightforward proof-of-stake system for achieving centralized governance: “PoS offers a more direct and practical way to achieve centralized control over a digital asset network without the computational and energy-intensive requirements of PoW.”

The overarching theme of Lowery’s commentary is that game-theoretic pressures—both among individuals and nation-states—tend to favor consolidation around a single, most secure PoW network. He argues that Bitcoin’s sheer scale and entrenched position give it a near-insurmountable lead. Meanwhile, nations seeking control might experiment with alternative protocols, but ultimately face a steep uphill battle competing against what has already been embraced by “the free and open market.”

At press time, BTC traded at $95,937.

Bitcoin price

from Bitcoinist.com https://ift.tt/orM3Aqi

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bitcoin ETFs Post Second Straight Week Of $500 Million Outflow — Details

The US-based spot Bitcoin ETFs (exchange-traded funds) recorded their second consecutive week of significant outflows over the last five-day trading period. This recent run of disappointing performances reflects the ongoing shift in investor sentiment in the United States. Over the past year, strong inflows into the US Bitcoin ETF market have constantly been associated with positive action for the BTC price. Fittingly, the price of Bitcoin has been consolidating over the past few weeks, struggling to pick up any real momentum. Bitcoin ETFs Record Fourth Consecutive Outflow Day According to the latest market data , the US Bitcoin ETFs registered a total daily outflow of $62.77 million on Friday, February 21. This latest round of withdrawals marked the fourth straight day (and the eighth day in the last nine trading days) that the crypto-based products would witness a net capital outflow. The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (with the ticker GBTC) accounted for a larger percentage of Friday’...

Bitcoin Remains Range-Bound As Volatility Declines – Analyst Explains Price Action

Bitcoin has experienced frustrating price action in recent weeks, leaving investors impatient about its short-term direction. The price has been testing crucial supply levels between $98K and $100K, struggling to break out as uncertainty dominates the market. The lack of a clear move has led to speculation about whether BTC is preparing for a breakout or another correction. Adding to the uncertainty, the market was hit by negative news on Friday when crypto exchange Bybit was hacked, resulting in the theft of $1.4 billion in ETH. The incident caused fear and volatility, briefly dragging prices lower. However, Bybit responded quickly to reassure investors, easing some of the initial panic and stabilizing the market. Despite this, Bitcoin continues to consolidate in a tight range. Crypto expert Daan shared an analysis on X, noting that BTC is still ranging while volatility is steadily decreasing. As price compression increases, traders are on high alert for a potential explosive move....

OpenSea Dodges A Bullet As SEC Drops Investigation—Details

In a move that many in the crypto industry view as a positive signal, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has officially discontinued its investigation into OpenSea, the leading NFT marketplace. This decision concludes months of uncertainty regarding the regulatory status of NFTs and their classification under US securities laws. SEC Decision Signals A Shift On February 21, 2025, Devin Finzer, the CEO and co-founder of OpenSea, said the SEC will not take any enforcement action against the firm. This comes following the August 2024 Wells Notice to OpenSea issued by the SEC, which indicated the possibility of legal action on alleged unregistered securities offenses. The outcome of this case suggests a possible shift in the way authorities handle NFTs, therefore affecting the whole scene of digital assets. For the industry, this outcome has been seen as a major turning point. Though they are in rivalry with OpenSea, Chris Akhavan, the Chief Business Officer of Magic Eden,...